Journal: Stroke and vascular neurology
Article Title: Extracellular vesicles bearing serum amyloid A1 exacerbate neuroinflammation after intracerebral haemorrhage.
doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003525
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5 Blocking SAA1 promotes microglia reactivity and leucocyte infiltration. (A) Bar graph indicating the elevation of plasma SAA1 levels in ICH mice as compared with the sham group. n= 5 mice in the ICH group and n=10 mice in the sham group. **p<0.01 by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. (B) Schematic diagram depicting intracerebral haemorrhage induction followed by intravenous administration of anti-SAA1 mAb or IgG 1 hour later. Immune cell populations were assessed using flow cytometry on days 1 and 3 post-ICH initiation. (C) Flow cytometry gating strategy depicting immune cell populations in mice brain treated with anti-SAA1 antibody or IgG on days 1 and day three post-ICH induction. The graph illustrates CD45high leucocytes, including CD3+CD19- T lymphocytes and its subtypes: CD4+CD8− T and CD4-CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD3−CD19+ B lymphocytes, CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils, and CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages. It also illustrates CD45int CD11b+microglia, including its subtypes: CD86+ microglia and CD206+ microglia. All gates were set using fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls. (D) Bar graph indicates the number of microglia and their subtypes in ICH mice with anti-SAA1 antibody or IgG treatment from days 1 to 3. (E) Bar graph shows major brain infiltrated leucocytes, involving CD8+ T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and neutrophils in ICH mice with anti-SAA1 antibody or IgG treatment from days 1 to 3. Int, intermediate. n=5, 6, 5 on day 1 and n=5, 13, 10 on day 3 for sham, IgG and mAb group. n=5, 9, 7 on day 3 for CD86+ microglia group in sham, IgG and mAb group specially. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Data are presented as means±SEM. ANOVA, analysis of variance; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage.
Article Snippet: We used anti- mouse SAA1 mAb (AF2948, NOVUS, USA) to block SAA1 in vivo at a dose of 0.25 μg/g, as previously reported.24 To establish a control, we administered Goat IgG Isotype Control (AB- 108- C, NOVUS, USA).
Techniques: Blocking Assay, Clinical Proteomics, Two Tailed Test, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence